Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Jammu and Kashmir High Court Case Commentaries

Court of Inquiry Is Not a Departmental Proceeding: J&K & Ladakh High Court on Simultaneous Criminal Trial, Internal Fact‑Finding and Suspension in the BSF

Court of Inquiry Is Not a Departmental Proceeding: J&K & Ladakh High Court on Simultaneous Criminal Trial, Internal Fact‑Finding and Suspension in the BSF

Date: Dec 17, 2025
Court of Inquiry Is Not a Departmental Proceeding: J&K & Ladakh High Court on Simultaneous Criminal Trial, Internal Fact‑Finding and Suspension in the BSF 1. Introduction In Akhand Prakash Shahi v....
Pension as a Service-Rule Benefit, Not a Constitutional Entitlement, for Employees of Government‑Funded Autonomous Schools – Commentary on Abdul Majeed Parray v. UT of J&K

Pension as a Service-Rule Benefit, Not a Constitutional Entitlement, for Employees of Government‑Funded Autonomous Schools – Commentary on Abdul Majeed Parray v. UT of J&K

Date: Dec 12, 2025
Pension as a Service-Rule Benefit, Not a Constitutional Entitlement, for Employees of Government‑Funded Autonomous Schools Commentary on Abdul Majeed Parray v. Union Territory of J&K & Ors., High...
Extinguishment of Borrower’s Right of Redemption on Publication of Auction Notice under Section 13(8) SARFAESI: Commentary on M/s Gogi Motor Store v. Citizen’s Co-operative Bank Ltd.

Extinguishment of Borrower’s Right of Redemption on Publication of Auction Notice under Section 13(8) SARFAESI: Commentary on M/s Gogi Motor Store v. Citizen’s Co-operative Bank Ltd.

Date: Dec 10, 2025
Extinguishment of Borrower’s Right of Redemption on Publication of Auction Notice under Section 13(8) SARFAESI: Case Commentary on M/s Gogi Motor Store v. Citizen’s Co-operative Bank Ltd. & Anr. 1....
Independent Satisfaction and Direct Resort to Preventive Detention under the J&K Public Safety Act: Commentary on Waseem Ahmad Dar v. UT of J&K

Independent Satisfaction and Direct Resort to Preventive Detention under the J&K Public Safety Act: Commentary on Waseem Ahmad Dar v. UT of J&K

Date: Dec 10, 2025
Independent Satisfaction and Direct Resort to Preventive Detention under the J&K Public Safety Act: Commentary on Waseem Ahmad Dar v. Government of J&K & Ors. 1. Introduction This commentary examines...
“Reasonable Grounds” Under Section 37 NDPS Act Are Less Than Proof: Commentary on Afraz Mehboob Tak v. Union of India

“Reasonable Grounds” Under Section 37 NDPS Act Are Less Than Proof: Commentary on Afraz Mehboob Tak v. Union of India

Date: Dec 9, 2025
“Reasonable Grounds” Under Section 37 NDPS Act Are Less Than Proof: A Detailed Commentary on Afraz Mehboob Tak v. Union of India I. Introduction The judgment in Afraz Mehboob Tak v. Union of India &...
Evacuee Property “Leases” as Non‑Heritable Licences: Heirs Must Seek Fresh Allotment on Premium and Cannot Invoke Rent‑Control Protection

Evacuee Property “Leases” as Non‑Heritable Licences: Heirs Must Seek Fresh Allotment on Premium and Cannot Invoke Rent‑Control Protection

Date: Dec 8, 2025
Evacuee Property “Leases” as Non‑Heritable Licences: Heirs Must Seek Fresh Allotment on Premium and Cannot Invoke Rent‑Control Protection Commentary on Ishtiaq Ahmad Mir & Ors. v. Custodian General &...
State Cannot Withhold Admitted Contractual Dues on Plea of Lack of Funds or Absence of Administrative Approval – Commentary on M/S Rightway Constructions Company v. UT of J&K

State Cannot Withhold Admitted Contractual Dues on Plea of Lack of Funds or Absence of Administrative Approval – Commentary on M/S Rightway Constructions Company v. UT of J&K

Date: Dec 5, 2025
State’s Duty to Pay Admitted Contractual Dues Despite Internal Sanctions or Shortage of Funds: A Commentary on M/S Rightway Constructions Company v. Union Territory of J & K & Ors. 1. Introduction...
Minority of Prosecutrix Cannot Cure Foundational Doubts: The “Sterling Witness” Standard in Rape Appeals — Commentary on Sanjay Kumar & Anr. v. State (J&K High Court, 2025)

Minority of Prosecutrix Cannot Cure Foundational Doubts: The “Sterling Witness” Standard in Rape Appeals — Commentary on Sanjay Kumar & Anr. v. State (J&K High Court, 2025)

Date: Dec 5, 2025
Minority of Prosecutrix Cannot Cure Foundational Doubts: The “Sterling Witness” Standard in Rape Appeals — Commentary on Sanjay Kumar & Anr. v. State (J&K High Court, 04.12.2025) I. Introduction The...

        Last Seen, Dock Identification and Section 106 in Circumstantial Murder:
        Commentary on Arvind Verma & Anr. v. State (J&K High Court, 28.11.2025)

Last Seen, Dock Identification and Section 106 in Circumstantial Murder: Commentary on Arvind Verma & Anr. v. State (J&K High Court, 28.11.2025)

Date: Dec 4, 2025
Last Seen, Dock Identification and Section 106 in Circumstantial Murder: Commentary on Arvind Verma & Anr. v. State, J&K High Court (28.11.2025) 1. Introduction The judgment in Arvind Verma & Anr. v....
Cross-LoC Barter Trade as Intra‑State Supply under GST and Validity of Composite Section 74 Show Cause Notices – Commentary on M/s R.J.M. Brothers v. Union of India & Ors.

Cross-LoC Barter Trade as Intra‑State Supply under GST and Validity of Composite Section 74 Show Cause Notices – Commentary on M/s R.J.M. Brothers v. Union of India & Ors.

Date: Nov 28, 2025
Cross-LoC Barter Trade as Intra‑State Supply under GST and Validity of Composite Section 74 Show Cause Notices – Commentary on M/s R.J.M. Brothers v. Union of India & Ors. 1. Introduction The...
Impleadment of Manufacturer and Joint Liability for Warranty-Period Defects under Consumer Law: Commentary on Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. v. Mohammad Ashraf Khan

Impleadment of Manufacturer and Joint Liability for Warranty-Period Defects under Consumer Law: Commentary on Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. v. Mohammad Ashraf Khan

Date: Nov 28, 2025
Impleadment of Manufacturer and Joint Liability for Warranty-Period Defects under Consumer Law: Commentary on Maruti Suzuki India Limited v. Mohammad Ashraf Khan & Ors 1. Introduction This commentary...
“Bail is the Rule” in Economic Offences under BNSS: Multiple FIRs and Criminal Antecedents Not a Bar Once Investigation is Complete – Commentary on Nagraj V. v. UT of J&K

“Bail is the Rule” in Economic Offences under BNSS: Multiple FIRs and Criminal Antecedents Not a Bar Once Investigation is Complete – Commentary on Nagraj V. v. UT of J&K

Date: Nov 27, 2025
“Bail is the Rule” in Economic Offences under BNSS: Multiple FIRs and Criminal Antecedents Not a Bar Once Investigation is Complete 1. Introduction The judgment in Nagraj V v. Union Territory of...
Prolonged Incarceration Alone Cannot Dilute Section 37 NDPS Bar on Bail in Commercial Quantity Cases – Commentary on
    Shahnawaz Ahmad Dar v. Union Territory of J&K (Police Station Bijbehara)

Prolonged Incarceration Alone Cannot Dilute Section 37 NDPS Bar on Bail in Commercial Quantity Cases – Commentary on Shahnawaz Ahmad Dar v. Union Territory of J&K (Police Station Bijbehara)

Date: Nov 25, 2025
Prolonged Incarceration Alone Cannot Dilute Section 37 NDPS Bar on Bail in Commercial Quantity Cases 1. Introduction The decision of the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh at Srinagar in...
Waiver of Statutory Right of Pre‑emption by Conduct: Commentary on Iqbal Singh v. Durga Devi (J&K High Court, 2025)

Waiver of Statutory Right of Pre‑emption by Conduct: Commentary on Iqbal Singh v. Durga Devi (J&K High Court, 2025)

Date: Nov 22, 2025
Waiver of Statutory Right of Pre‑emption by Conduct: Commentary on Iqbal Singh v. Durga Devi & Ors. (J&K High Court, 21 November 2025) I. Introduction The judgment in CFA No. 19/2001, Iqbal Singh v....
"Wages Follow the Post, Not the Person": Commentary on Umer Mukhtar Mir v. UT of J&K & Ors.

"Wages Follow the Post, Not the Person": Commentary on Umer Mukhtar Mir v. UT of J&K & Ors.

Date: Nov 15, 2025
"Wages Follow the Post, Not the Person": Commentary on Umer Mukhtar Mir v. Union Territory of J&K & Ors. (Forest Department) 1. Introduction The judgment of the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and...
Simultaneous Criminal and Departmental Proceedings in Sexual Misconduct Cases within Uniformed Forces: Commentary on Akhand Prakash Shahi v. Union of India & Anr.

Simultaneous Criminal and Departmental Proceedings in Sexual Misconduct Cases within Uniformed Forces: Commentary on Akhand Prakash Shahi v. Union of India & Anr.

Date: Nov 15, 2025
Simultaneous Criminal and Departmental Proceedings in Sexual Misconduct Cases within Uniformed Forces: Commentary on Akhand Prakash Shahi v. Union of India & Anr., J&K High Court (2025) 1....
Doctrine of Merger, SLP Dismissal, and Scope of Review: Commentary on Zahida Shah & Anr. v. Bilal Ahmad Dar & Ors.

Doctrine of Merger, SLP Dismissal, and Scope of Review: Commentary on Zahida Shah & Anr. v. Bilal Ahmad Dar & Ors.

Date: Nov 9, 2025
Doctrine of Merger, SLP Dismissal, and Scope of High Court Review Jurisdiction A Commentary on Zahida Shah & Anr. and Dr. Sham-su-nisa & Ors. v. Bilal Ahmad Dar & Ors. (Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh...
Ad Hoc Service and the NPS Cut-Off: Commentary on Adnan Wani & Ors. v. High Court of J&K & Ladakh

Ad Hoc Service and the NPS Cut-Off: Commentary on Adnan Wani & Ors. v. High Court of J&K & Ladakh

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Ad Hoc Service Cannot Override the NPS Cut‑Off: A Detailed Commentary on Adnan Wani & Ors. v. High Court of J&K & Ladakh 1. Introduction 1.1. Case Overview This commentary examines the judgment of...
Substantive Posts vs. Session-Based Academic Arrangements: Scope of the “Ad Hoc Cannot Replace Ad Hoc” Doctrine

Substantive Posts vs. Session-Based Academic Arrangements: Scope of the “Ad Hoc Cannot Replace Ad Hoc” Doctrine

Date: Nov 8, 2025
Substantive Posts vs. Session-Based Academic Arrangements: Scope of the “Ad Hoc Cannot Replace Ad Hoc” Doctrine I. Introduction The Division Bench of the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh at...
Post-Retirement Recovery from Pension under J&K CSR Article 168‑A Requires a Specific Charge and Proven “Loss to Government”; CCA proceedings cannot be used after superannuation — J&K High Court in Sudershan Mehta v. UT of J&K

Post-Retirement Recovery from Pension under J&K CSR Article 168‑A Requires a Specific Charge and Proven “Loss to Government”; CCA proceedings cannot be used after superannuation — J&K High Court in Sudershan Mehta v. UT of J&K

Date: Sep 12, 2025
Post-Retirement Recovery from Pension under J&K CSR Article 168‑A Requires a Specific Charge and Proven “Loss to Government”; CCA proceedings cannot be used after superannuation — J&K High Court in...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert